Beckett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Beckett v. State

1919 OK CR 78, 178 P. 688, 15 Okla. Crim. 688, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 50

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 5, 1919

DocketNo. A-3193.

StatusPublished

This text of 1919 OK CR 78 (Beckett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beckett v. State, 1919 OK CR 78, 178 P. 688, 15 Okla. Crim. 688, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 50 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Ross Beckett, was convicted of keeping a place in the city of Enid with the felonious intent and pul-póse of selling intoxicating liquors. To reverse the judgment rendered on the verdict, he appeals. In the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, the statute upon which this prosecution was based, is held unconstitutional and void. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Ross Beckett, was convicted of keeping a place in the city of Enid with the felonious intent and pul-póse of selling intoxicating liquors. To reverse the judgment rendered on the verdict, he appeals. In the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, the statute upon which this prosecution was based, is held unconstitutional and void. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment is reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1919 OK CR 78, 178 P. 688, 15 Okla. Crim. 688, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beckett-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack