Beckett v. State
1919 OK CR 78, 178 P. 688, 15 Okla. Crim. 688, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 50
Opinion
Plaintiff in error, Ross Beckett, was convicted of keeping a place in the city of Enid with the felonious intent and pul-póse of selling intoxicating liquors. To reverse the judgment rendered on the verdict, he appeals. In the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, the statute upon which this prosecution was based, is held unconstitutional and void. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Beckett v. State, 1919 OK CR 78, 178 P. 688, 15 Okla. Crim. 688, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 50 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).
1919 OK CR 78 (Beckett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Proctor v. State
1918 OK CR 190 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1918)