Beckerman v. United States

Seventh Circuit

Beckerman v. United States

267 F. 185, 1920 U.S. App. LEXIS 2160

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedApril 27, 1920

DocketNo. 2732

StatusPublished

This text of 267 F. 185 (Beckerman v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beckerman v. United States, 267 F. 185, 1920 U.S. App. LEXIS 2160 (7th Cir. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff in error was convicted upon two counts of an indictment — the first charging him with having stolen five cases of shoes from “the station house of the Columbia Transfer Company in St. Louis, which said shoes were then and there consigned and in transit in interstate commerce from St. Louis to Kimberland, N. C.”; the second charging him with having in his possession five cases of shoes that to his knowledge had been stolen and carried away from the “station house” of the Columbia Transfer Company, etc. The Columbia Transfer Company handles freight by wagon, maintains a warehouse in East St. Louis, and hauls freight, between the railroad depot and its warehouse, or a shipper’s place of business. The five cases of shoes had been delivered by the manufacturing company to the drayman of the Columbia Transfer Company, and by such drayman taken to the warehouse. They were later to be shipped to North Carolina.

The judgment is assailed because unsupported by the evidence; it being the urge of plaintiff in error that the “station house” referred to in the statute must be a railroad station house. The statute reads:

“Whoever shall steal or unlawfully take, carry away, or conceal ** * * from any railroad ear, station house, platform, depot, steamboat, vessel, or wharf, with intent to convert to his own use any goods or chattels moving as, or which are a part of or which constitute, an interstate or foreign shipment of freight,” etc. Comp. St. § 8603.

No' case has been called to our attention, and we have been unable to find any decision that supports the government’s position. Under the doctrine of noscitur a sociis the meaning of the words “station house” is dependent upon the associated words. . The word “railroad” not only modifies “car,” but “station house,” “platform,” and “depot.”

It follows that the judgment must be and is hereby reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff in error was convicted upon two counts of an indictment — the first charging him with having stolen five cases of shoes from “the station house of the Columbia Transfer Company in St. Louis, which said shoes were then and there consigned and in transit in interstate commerce from St. Louis to Kimberland, N. C.”; the second charging him with having in his possession five cases of shoes that to his knowledge had been stolen and carried away from the “station house” of the Columbia Transfer Company, etc. The Columbia Transfer Company handles freight by wagon, maintains a warehouse in East St. Louis, and hauls freight, between the railroad depot and its warehouse, or a shipper’s place of business. The five cases of shoes had been delivered by the manufacturing company to the drayman of the Columbia Transfer Company, and by such drayman taken to the warehouse. They were later to be shipped to North Carolina.

The judgment is assailed because unsupported by the evidence; it being the urge of plaintiff in error that the “station house” referred to in the statute must be a railroad station house. The statute reads:

“Whoever shall steal or unlawfully take, carry away, or conceal ** * * from any railroad ear, station house, platform, depot, steamboat, vessel, or wharf, with intent to convert to his own use any goods or chattels moving as, or which are a part of or which constitute, an interstate or foreign shipment of freight,” etc. Comp. St. § 8603.

No' case has been called to our attention, and we have been unable to find any decision that supports the government’s position. Under the doctrine of noscitur a sociis the meaning of the words “station house” is dependent upon the associated words. . The word “railroad” not only modifies “car,” but “station house,” “platform,” and “depot.”

It follows that the judgment must be and is hereby reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 F. 185, 1920 U.S. App. LEXIS 2160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beckerman-v-united-states-ca7-1920.