Becker v. United States

23 Cust. Ct. 184, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 959
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Becker v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 Cust. Ct. 404
United States Customs Court·Decided October 10, 1949·No. No. 53622; protest 136651-K (Los Angeles)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the trial there was no appearance on the part of the plaintiff and Government counsel submitted the case on the record. The collec[185]*185tor’s report states that if plaintiff had complied with section 10.53, Customs Regulations of 1943, and produced a shipper’s affidavit of antiquity to substantiate his claim, the merchandise would have been entitled to free entry. Since the record failed to show compliance with the regulations, the claim of the plaintiff was overruled. Brummer Gallery, Inc. v. United States (2 Cust. Ct. 94, C. D. 95) followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Becker v. United States, 23 Cust. Ct. 184, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 959 (cusc 1949).

23 Cust. Ct. 184 (Becker v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brummer Gallery, Inc. v. United States
2 Cust. Ct. 94 (U.S. Customs Court, 1939)