Becker v. Sidweber
This text of 237 A.D. 909 (Becker v. Sidweber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order of the County Court of Rockland county reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and defendant’s default opened and the judgment entered thereon vacated, upon payment to the plaintiff of ten dollars motion costs. In our opinion, the defendant’s default was excusable because of his serious illness, his absence from Rockland county and his confinement in a sanatorium at the time the cause was reached for trial. Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Davis, J., concurs for reversal in the exercise of discretion, but on condition that the defendant stipulate that the cause of action shall not abate, it being doubtful that the plaintiff will ever be able to bring the cause to trial during the lifetime of the defendant, against the objection of the party undertaking the defense; and that the evident purpose is one of delay to the end that plaintiff will be deprived of his remedy.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
237 A.D. 909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/becker-v-sidweber-nyappdiv-1933.