Becker v. Schellinger

238 N.W.2d 889, 307 Minn. 512, 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1855
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedFebruary 20, 1976
Docket45733
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 238 N.W.2d 889 (Becker v. Schellinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Becker v. Schellinger, 238 N.W.2d 889, 307 Minn. 512, 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1855 (Mich. 1976).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

This employee seeks review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board denying his claim for temporary partial disability benefits. The legal issue raised on appeal was recently decided in LeMieux v. Mortenson, 306 Minn. 50, 234 N. W. 2d 897 (1975). Although this appeal presents some factual differences from LeMieux, they are differences without legal significance.

The dissenting commissioner expressed concern for the ability of the employee to continue in his present employment subject to his dis *513 ability. Should the employee become unable to do so, appropriate relief would be available under Minn. St. 176.461.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morehouse v. Geo. A. Hormel & Co.
313 N.W.2d 8 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1981)
Ahoe v. Quality Park Products
258 N.W.2d 885 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1977)
Briese v. Hagen, Inc.
257 N.W.2d 700 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
238 N.W.2d 889, 307 Minn. 512, 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/becker-v-schellinger-minn-1976.