Becker v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Becker v. Public Utilities Commission

147 N.E. 764, 112 Ohio St. 565, 112 Ohio St. (N.S.) 565, 1925 Ohio LEXIS 318

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 21, 1925

Docket18820

StatusPublished

This text of 147 N.E. 764 (Becker v. Public Utilities Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Becker v. Public Utilities Commission, 147 N.E. 764, 112 Ohio St. 565, 112 Ohio St. (N.S.) 565, 1925 Ohio LEXIS 318 (Ohio 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

The question involved in this case is one of fact. One Edward A. Carley filed his affidavit with the Public Utilities Commission, in accordance with Section 614-87, General Code (110 O. L., 215), in which he stated that on April 28, 1923, he was operating in good faith a bus line over the route set forth in the affidavit. A protest was filed by the plaintiff in error. Upon hearing, the Public Utilities Commission found that the *566 statements in the affidavit of Carley were true, and awarded him a certificate of public convenience and necessity.

We have examined the record and find nothing therein which, taken in connection with the explanation of Carley, is inconsistent with the truth of the facts alleged in his affidavit.

The order of the commission is affirmed.

Order affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

The question involved in this case is one of fact. One Edward A. Carley filed his affidavit with the Public Utilities Commission, in accordance with Section 614-87, General Code (110 O. L., 215), in which he stated that on April 28, 1923, he was operating in good faith a bus line over the route set forth in the affidavit. A protest was filed by the plaintiff in error. Upon hearing, the Public Utilities Commission found that the *566 statements in the affidavit of Carley were true, and awarded him a certificate of public convenience and necessity.

We have examined the record and find nothing therein which, taken in connection with the explanation of Carley, is inconsistent with the truth of the facts alleged in his affidavit.

The order of the commission is affirmed.

Order affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Jones, Matthias, Day, Allen, Kinkade and Robinson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 N.E. 764, 112 Ohio St. 565, 112 Ohio St. (N.S.) 565, 1925 Ohio LEXIS 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/becker-v-public-utilities-commission-ohio-1925.