Becker v. Pleasant Valley Farms, Ltd.

261 A.D.2d 427, 690 N.Y.S.2d 76, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4730
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 10, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 261 A.D.2d 427 (Becker v. Pleasant Valley Farms, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Becker v. Pleasant Valley Farms, Ltd., 261 A.D.2d 427, 690 N.Y.S.2d 76, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4730 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.), dated December 17, 1997, which granted the cross motion of the defendant Donald Jones for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against him and, upon searching the record, granted summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the remaining defendants, and (2) so much of an order of the same court, dated July 7, 1998, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated December 17, 1997, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated July 7, 1998, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated July 7, 1998, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

The Supreme Court correctly determined that the injured plaintiff, an experienced rider who was aware of the subject horse’s background, assumed the risks inherent in the sport of horseback riding, including the risk that a horse might bolt or become frightened (see, Morgan v State of New York, 90 NY2d 471, 484; Turcotte v Fell, 68 NY2d 432, 439; Harrington v Colvin, 237 AD2d 992; cf., Lewis v Erie County Agric. Socy., 256 AD2d 1114; Hommel v Benshoff, 178 Misc 2d 1038). Accordingly, the defendants were entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kirkland v. Hall
38 A.D.3d 497 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Tilson v. Russo
30 A.D.3d 856 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Eslin v. County of Suffolk
18 A.D.3d 698 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Trummer v. Niewisch
17 A.D.3d 349 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Norkus v. Scolaro
267 A.D.2d 666 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Lecznar v. Sanford
265 A.D.2d 728 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 A.D.2d 427, 690 N.Y.S.2d 76, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/becker-v-pleasant-valley-farms-ltd-nyappdiv-1999.