Becker v. Nuelle

Missouri Court of Appeals

Becker v. Nuelle

205 S.W.3d 324, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1718, 2006 WL 3290474

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 14, 2006·No. No. ED 86654·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Deborah Nuelle appeals the judgment ordering the sale of certain real property owned by her and her brother, Cary Becker, as joint tenants and the court’s non-responsive denial of her request to be reimbursed for money she spent settling their deceased mother’s estate. The judgment was supported by substantial evidence, and the court did not misstate or misapply the law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Deborah Nuelle appeals the judgment ordering the sale of certain real property owned by her and her brother, Cary Becker, as joint tenants and the court’s non-responsive denial of her request to be reimbursed for money she spent settling their deceased mother’s estate. The judgment was supported by substantial evidence, and the court did not misstate or misapply the law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Becker v. Nuelle, 205 S.W.3d 324, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1718, 2006 WL 3290474 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

205 S.W.3d 324 (Becker v. Nuelle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.