Becker v. Lorello
This text of 243 A.D. 862 (Becker v. Lorello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
-Judgment reversed on the law, with costs, and judgment directed for the defendant, with costs. Memorandum: In order that the plaintiff should recover from the defendant the sum paid by him on account of the purchase price as well as his expenses in examining title, it was necessary for plaintiff to put the defendant in default by tendering the balance of the purchase money on the date provided in the contract. This the plaintiff wholly failed to do. Further he did not prove that the defendant would have been unable to convey the property to him had he made the tender. All concur. (The judgment was for plaintiff in an action to recover money paid upon a land contract.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Edgeomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
243 A.D. 862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/becker-v-lorello-nyappdiv-1935.