Becker v. Clearview Acres, Ltd.
This text of 237 A.D.2d 926 (Becker v. Clearview Acres, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Order affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Jonathan E. Becker (plaintiff), an employee of third-party defendant, Utica Alloys, Inc., sustained injuries when he fell from the top of a degreaser machine located in a plant owned by defendant, Clearview Acres, Ltd. Supreme Court properly granted the cross motions of defendant and third-party defendant for partial summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action. At the time of the accident, plaintiff was engaged in the removal of a spiral unit from inside the degreaser machine so that leaks that had developed in the steam coil could be welded. Consequently, Labor Law § 240 (1) does not apply here because plaintiff was engaged in routine maintenance in a non-construction, non-renovation context (see, Smith v Shell Oil Co., 85 NY2d 1000, 1002; Rennoldson v Volpe Realty Corp., 216 AD2d 912, lv dismissed 86 NY2d 837).
All concur except Fallon, J., who dissents and votes to reverse in the following Memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
237 A.D.2d 926, 656 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/becker-v-clearview-acres-ltd-nyappdiv-1997.