Becker v. City of New York
This text of 1 A.D.2d 1004 (Becker v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Concur — Botein, Cox, Frank and Valente, JJ.; Breitel, J. P., dissents and votes to reverse and grant a new trial on the authority of Liubowsky v. State of New York (260 App. Div. 416, affd. 285 N. Y. 701); Robison v. State of New York (263 App. Div. 240); Court [1005]*1005of Claims Act, § 8; Bernardine v. City of New York (294 N. Y. 361). (Cf. Kaplan v. State of New York, 198 Misc. 62, affd. 277 App. Div. 1065.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 A.D.2d 1004, 153 N.Y.S.2d 538, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/becker-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1956.