Becker v. Bunting

999 N.E.2d 693, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1437
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 24, 2013
Docket2013-1504
StatusPublished

This text of 999 N.E.2d 693 (Becker v. Bunting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Becker v. Bunting, 999 N.E.2d 693, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1437 (Ohio 2013).

Opinion

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Jan Francis Becker et al. Cause dismissed. Petitioners’ instant motion for immediate en banc hearing is denied.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, French, and O’Neill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
999 N.E.2d 693, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/becker-v-bunting-ohio-2013.