Becker v. Becker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Becker v. Becker

212 A.D.2d 1060, 624 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2006

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 3, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint. In opposing defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b), plaintiff failed to meet his burden of showing that the delay in serving the complaint was excusable and that his cause of action for divorce was meritorious (see, Fantauzzo v Steimer, 193 AD2d 1125; Iafallo v Dolan, 162 AD2d 965). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Howe, J.—Dismiss Action.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint. In opposing defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b), plaintiff failed to meet his burden of showing that the delay in serving the complaint was excusable and that his cause of action for divorce was meritorious (see, Fantauzzo v Steimer, 193 AD2d 1125; Iafallo v Dolan, 162 AD2d 965). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Howe, J.—Dismiss Action.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Becker v. Becker, 212 A.D.2d 1060, 624 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2006 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

212 A.D.2d 1060 (Becker v. Becker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related