Becker v. Becker

212 A.D.2d 1060, 624 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2006
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 3, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 212 A.D.2d 1060 (Becker v. Becker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Becker v. Becker, 212 A.D.2d 1060, 624 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2006 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint. In opposing defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3012 (b), plaintiff failed to meet his burden of showing that the delay in serving the complaint was excusable and that his cause of action for divorce was meritorious (see, Fantauzzo v Steimer, 193 AD2d 1125; Iafallo v Dolan, 162 AD2d 965). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Howe, J.—Dismiss Action.) Present—Lawton, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fotiadis v. Fotiadis
18 A.D.3d 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 A.D.2d 1060, 624 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/becker-v-becker-nyappdiv-1995.