Becker v. Becker

56 P. 243, 24 Nev. 476
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 5, 1899
DocketNo. 1553.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 56 P. 243 (Becker v. Becker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Becker v. Becker, 56 P. 243, 24 Nev. 476 (Neb. 1899).

Opinion

By the Court,

Bonnieield, C. J.:

This is an appeal from a final judgment. Respondent moves the court for an order dismissing the appeal, on the ground that the original papers are not properly certified. They are certified to be all of the original papers filed in the district court, but are not certified to constitute in whole or *477 part the record on appeal. A record without being certified as the statute requires is not a record on appeal.

“Where, instead of a regular transcript, the original papers are sent up on appeal, under Stats. 1895 (p. 58), they must be certified to be such originals and to constitute in whole or in part the record on appeal. Where there is no certificate to that effect the appeal will, upon motion, be dismissed.” (Holmes v. Iowa M. Co., 23 Nev. 23.)

Respondent’s motion is granted, and the appeal dismissed.

With reference to the said statute of 1895, we also call the attention of litigants to Streeter v. Johnson, 23 Nev. 194; Peers v. Reed, 23 Nev. 404.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hill
32 Nev. 185 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1909)
Quinn v. Quinn
74 P. 5 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1903)
State v. Bouton
62 P. 595 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 P. 243, 24 Nev. 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/becker-v-becker-nev-1899.