Becker v. Becker

56 P. 243, 24 Nev. 476
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided January 5, 1899·No. No. 1553.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Bonnieield, C. J.:

This is an appeal from a final judgment. Respondent moves the court for an order dismissing the appeal, on the ground that the original papers are not properly certified. They are certified to be all of the original papers filed in the district court, but are not certified to constitute in whole or *477 part the record on appeal. A record without being certified as the statute requires is not a record on appeal.

“Where, instead of a regular transcript, the original papers are sent up on appeal, under Stats. 1895 (p. 58), they must be certified to be such originals and to constitute in whole or in part the record on appeal. Where there is no certificate to that effect the appeal will, upon motion, be dismissed.” (Holmes v. Iowa M. Co., 23 Nev. 23.)

Respondent’s motion is granted, and the appeal dismissed.

With reference to the said statute of 1895, we also call the attention of litigants to Streeter v. Johnson, 23 Nev. 194; Peers v. Reed, 23 Nev. 404.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Becker v. Becker, 56 P. 243, 24 Nev. 476 (Neb. 1899).

56 P. 243 (Becker v. Becker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hill
32 Nev. 185 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1909)
Quinn v. Quinn
74 P. 5 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1903)
State v. Bouton
62 P. 595 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1900)