BECKENSTEIN ENTERPRISESPRESTIGE PARK, LLC v. Keller
979 A.2d 488, 293 Conn. 916
This text of 979 A.2d 488 (BECKENSTEIN ENTERPRISESPRESTIGE PARK, LLC v. Keller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
BECKENSTEIN ENTERPRISESPRESTIGE PARK, LLC v. Keller, 979 A.2d 488, 293 Conn. 916 (Colo. 2009).
Opinion
BECKENSTEIN ENTERPRISESPRESTIGE PARK, LLC, et al.
v.
Jonathan M. KELLER et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Michael P. Berman and Suzanne LaPlante, Hartford, in support of the petition.
Richard P. Weinstein, West Hartford, and Nathan A. Schatz, in opposition.
The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 115 Conn.App. 680, 974 A.2d 764 (2009), is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Beckenstein Enterprises-Prestige Park, LLC v. Keller
974 A.2d 764 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
979 A.2d 488, 293 Conn. 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beckenstein-enterprisesprestige-park-llc-v-keller-conn-2009.