Beck v. Vizcaya

Third Circuit

Beck v. Vizcaya

182 F.2d 942, 1950 A.M.C. 1636

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided June 29, 1950·No. No. 10157·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the consignees of a cargo of bags of nuts from a decree [943]*943which awarded them some but not all of the damages they sought against a carrier. The matter was thoroughly discussed in a full opinion by the court below. D.C.E.D. Pa.1949, 88 F.Supp. 818. We do not feel that we can add anything helpful to that discussion and so affirm on that opinion.

The decree of the District Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the consignees of a cargo of bags of nuts from a decree [943]*943which awarded them some but not all of the damages they sought against a carrier. The matter was thoroughly discussed in a full opinion by the court below. D.C.E.D. Pa.1949, 88 F.Supp. 818. We do not feel that we can add anything helpful to that discussion and so affirm on that opinion.

The decree of the District Court will be affirmed.

Beck v. Vizcaya, 182 F.2d 942, 1950 A.M.C. 1636 (3d Cir. 1950).

Pincite

182 F.2d 942 (Beck v. Vizcaya) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related