Beck v. Vizcaya

Third Circuit

Beck v. Vizcaya

182 F.2d 942, 1950 A.M.C. 1636

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJune 29, 1950

DocketNo. 10157

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 182 F.2d 942 (Beck v. Vizcaya) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beck v. Vizcaya, 182 F.2d 942, 1950 A.M.C. 1636 (3d Cir. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the consignees of a cargo of bags of nuts from a decree [943]*943which awarded them some but not all of the damages they sought against a carrier. The matter was thoroughly discussed in a full opinion by the court below. D.C.E.D. Pa.1949, 88 F.Supp. 818. We do not feel that we can add anything helpful to that discussion and so affirm on that opinion.

The decree of the District Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the consignees of a cargo of bags of nuts from a decree [943]*943which awarded them some but not all of the damages they sought against a carrier. The matter was thoroughly discussed in a full opinion by the court below. D.C.E.D. Pa.1949, 88 F.Supp. 818. We do not feel that we can add anything helpful to that discussion and so affirm on that opinion.

The decree of the District Court will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 F.2d 942, 1950 A.M.C. 1636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beck-v-vizcaya-ca3-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack