Beck v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Beck v. State

391 S.W.3d 913, 2013 WL 542025, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 180

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 13, 2013·No. No. ED 98290·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Harriston M. Beck, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have - no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their infor[914] mation only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Harriston M. Beck, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have - no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their infor[914] mation only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Beck v. State, 391 S.W.3d 913, 2013 WL 542025, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 180 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

391 S.W.3d 913 (Beck v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.