Beck v. State
791 So. 2d 1232, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11491, 2001 WL 929849
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 17, 2001
DocketNo. 5D00-277
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 791 So. 2d 1232 (Beck v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Beck v. State, 791 So. 2d 1232, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11491, 2001 WL 929849 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
Opinion
We affirm on the authority of Westerheide v. State, 767 So.2d 637 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000), rev. granted, 786 So.2d 1192 (Fla.2001) and certify the same questions to be of great public importance:
1) DOES THE JIMMY RYCE ACT VIOLATE THE EX POST FACTO CLAUSES OF THE UNITED STATES AND FLORIDA CONSTITUTIONS?
2) DOES THE JIMMY RYCE ACT VIOLATE THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSES OF THE UNITED STATES AND FLORIDA CONSTITUTIONS?
3) DOES THE JIMMY RYCE ACT VIOLATE THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSES OF THE UNITED STATES AND FLORIDA CONSTITUTIONS?
4) DOES THE JIMMY RYCE ACT VIOLATE THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSES OF THE UNITED STATES AND FLORIDA CONSTITUTIONS?
AFFIRMED; QUESTIONS CERTIFIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Poole v. State
791 So. 2d 1232 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
791 So. 2d 1232, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11491, 2001 WL 929849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beck-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.