Beck v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Beck v. State

126 So. 182, 23 Ala. App. 398, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 34

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 11, 1930

Docket7 Div. 624.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 126 So. 182 (Beck v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beck v. State, 126 So. 182, 23 Ala. App. 398, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 34 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The evidence in this case discloses a state of fapts from which the jury was authorized to draw inference of guilt, and while the officers found only two or three teaspoonfuls of whisky, there was evidence which, if believed beyond a reasonable doubt, tended to prove a larger quantity. However, under our decisions the quantity is immaterial. The general charge was properly refused.

Refused charge 2 is covered by the oral charge.

The evidence 'being in conflict and giving to the conclusions of the court the weight to which they are entitled, we cannot say there was error in overruling the motion for a new trial.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI