Beck v. Northwestern R. R.

78 S.E. 994, 95 S.C. 339
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJuly 30, 1913
Docket8629
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 78 S.E. 994 (Beck v. Northwestern R. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beck v. Northwestern R. R., 78 S.E. 994, 95 S.C. 339 (S.C. 1913).

Opinions

July 30, 1913. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This is an appeal from an order allowing the defendant to amend its answer in certain particulars.

The exceptions raise two questions, the first of which is whether his Honor, the Circuit Judge, had the power to allow the amendments.

The case of Taylor v. R.R., 81 S.C. 574, 62 S.E. 1113, which has been affirmed in numerous subsequent cases, is conclusive of this question, and shows that the exceptions raising this question cannot be sustained.

The next question is whether there was an abuse of discretion.

The appellant has failed to satisfy this Court that there was error in this respect, and the exceptions raising this question are also overruled.

Appeal dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE WATTS. I concur only in the result in the opinion of the Chief Justice, for the reason that I am loath to disturb the action of the Circuit Judge in the exercise of his discretion unless there is abuse, and I cannot say there is. As to what effect the amendment allowed will have in view of the decision of this Court in Abbott v. Lumber Co.,93 S.C. 131, it is at this time unnecessary to consider. *Page 341

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beck v. Northwestern R. Co. of S.C.
89 S.E. 1018 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 S.E. 994, 95 S.C. 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beck-v-northwestern-r-r-sc-1913.