Beck v. Nichols

Missouri Court of Appeals

Beck v. Nichols

261 S.W.3d 711, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1155, 2008 WL 4004085

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 2, 2008·No. WD 68833·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alma Ruth Nichols appeals from a judgment in an action for partition in which the court overruled her objections to the commissioners’ report and confirmed the report, ordered her to pay a pro rata share of the cost of obtaining a quitclaim deed on a portion of the property, and granted the plaintiffs’ request for supplemental attorney fees. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that there was no abuse of discretion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alma Ruth Nichols appeals from a judgment in an action for partition in which the court overruled her objections to the commissioners’ report and confirmed the report, ordered her to pay a pro rata share of the cost of obtaining a quitclaim deed on a portion of the property, and granted the plaintiffs’ request for supplemental attorney fees. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that there was no abuse of discretion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Beck v. Nichols, 261 S.W.3d 711, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1155, 2008 WL 4004085 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

261 S.W.3d 711 (Beck v. Nichols) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related