Beck v. Milwaukee County

219 N.W. 205, 196 Wis. 259, 1928 Wisc. LEXIS 209
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided June 18, 1928·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The following opinion was filed March 6, 1928:

Owen, J.

This action is brought against the county of Milwaukee and its treasurers by the heirs and donees of Patrick Cudahy, deceased, to recover from the county of Milwaukee that portion of the inheritance tax retained by it, claimed to have been unlawfully exacted from the estate of Patrick Cudahy, deceased. It involves a part of the same tax and raises the identical questions considered in Beck v. [260]*260State, decided herewith {ante, p. 242, 219 N. W. 197). That case is decisive of this, from which it results that the demurrer in this case was not only properly overruled, but that the complaint does not state a cause of action, and that the action should be dismissed.

By the Court, — Order affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied on June 18, 1928.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck v. Milwaukee County, 219 N.W. 205, 196 Wis. 259, 1928 Wisc. LEXIS 209 (Wis. 1928).

219 N.W. 205 (Beck v. Milwaukee County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

O'Malley v. Sims
75 P.2d 50 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1938)
State ex rel. Straight v. Levitan
222 N.W. 805 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1929)