Beck v. Milwaukee County

219 N.W. 205, 196 Wis. 259, 1928 Wisc. LEXIS 209
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedJune 18, 1928
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 219 N.W. 205 (Beck v. Milwaukee County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beck v. Milwaukee County, 219 N.W. 205, 196 Wis. 259, 1928 Wisc. LEXIS 209 (Wis. 1928).

Opinion

The following opinion was filed March 6, 1928:

Owen, J.

This action is brought against the county of Milwaukee and its treasurers by the heirs and donees of Patrick Cudahy, deceased, to recover from the county of Milwaukee that portion of the inheritance tax retained by it, claimed to have been unlawfully exacted from the estate of Patrick Cudahy, deceased. It involves a part of the same tax and raises the identical questions considered in Beck v. [260]*260State, decided herewith {ante, p. 242, 219 N. W. 197). That case is decisive of this, from which it results that the demurrer in this case was not only properly overruled, but that the complaint does not state a cause of action, and that the action should be dismissed.

By the Court, — Order affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied on June 18, 1928.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Malley v. Sims
75 P.2d 50 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1938)
State ex rel. Straight v. Levitan
222 N.W. 805 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 N.W. 205, 196 Wis. 259, 1928 Wisc. LEXIS 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beck-v-milwaukee-county-wis-1928.