Beck v. . Halliwell
This text of 163 S.E. 927 (Beck v. . Halliwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There was evidence at the trial of this action tending to show that defendant is liable to the plaintiff as an original promisor for the purchase price of the goods delivered by plaintiff to the corporation in which defendant was a stockholder. “It is too well settled to require the citation of sustaining authorities that the statute of frauds does not apply to the original promises or undertakings, though the benefit accrues to another than the promisor.” Hospital Association v. Hobbs, 153 N. C., 188, 69 S. E., 79.
Defendant’s motion for judgment as of nonsuit was properly denied. The judgment is affirmed.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 S.E. 927, 202 N.C. 846, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beck-v-halliwell-nc-1932.