Beck v. Broad Channel Bathing Park, Inc.
231 A.D. 734
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1930
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 231 A.D. 734 (Beck v. Broad Channel Bathing Park, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Beck v. Broad Channel Bathing Park, Inc., 231 A.D. 734 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
Opinion
Judgment dismissing complaint affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Kapper, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Hagarty, J., dissent, being of opinion that there was a question of fact for determination by the jury because of the location of the post in proximity to the ladder.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Maull v. State
16 Misc. 2d 499 (New York State Court of Claims, 1959)
Sciarello v. Coast Holding Co.
242 A.D. 802 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
231 A.D. 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beck-v-broad-channel-bathing-park-inc-nyappdiv-1930.