Beck v. Broad Channel Bathing Park, Inc.
231 A.D. 734
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1930·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Judgment dismissing complaint affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Kapper, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Hagarty, J., dissent, being of opinion that there was a question of fact for determination by the jury because of the location of the post in proximity to the ladder.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Beck v. Broad Channel Bathing Park, Inc., 231 A.D. 734 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
231 A.D. 734 (Beck v. Broad Channel Bathing Park, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Maull v. State
16 Misc. 2d 499 (New York State Court of Claims, 1959)
Sciarello v. Coast Holding Co.
242 A.D. 802 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)