Beck v. Bohm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Beck v. Bohm

95 A.D. 273, 88 N.Y.S. 584

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 1, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 95 A.D. 273 (Beck v. Bohm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beck v. Bohm, 95 A.D. 273, 88 N.Y.S. 584 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We do not think that we should sanction the practice of requiring a defendant to produce for inspection a deed at a photographer’s studio so that it might be photographed. We think the better practice is to direct that the deed should be placed in the custody of [274]*274the county clerk with permission to the plaintiff to inspect it and, if he desires, to have it photographed. .

The order accordingly should be so modified, without costs.

Present—O’Brien, Ingraham, McLaughlin,. Hatch and Laughlin, JJ.

Order modified, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

We do not think that we should sanction the practice of requiring a defendant to produce for inspection a deed at a photographer’s studio so that it might be photographed. We think the better practice is to direct that the deed should be placed in the custody of [274]*274the county clerk with permission to the plaintiff to inspect it and, if he desires, to have it photographed. .

The order accordingly should be so modified, without costs.

Present—O’Brien, Ingraham, McLaughlin,. Hatch and Laughlin, JJ.

Order modified, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 A.D. 273, 88 N.Y.S. 584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beck-v-bohm-nyappdiv-1904.