Beck v. Beck

187 S.E.2d 355, 14 N.C. App. 163, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 2069
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided March 29, 1972·No. 7222DC22·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

GRAHAM, Judge.

Defendant contends that in order to be entitled to a divorce a plaintiff must show that a marital separation for the statutory period was by mutual agreement or under a decree of court. This was true prior to 1937. In that year the divorce statute was amended so as to remove this requirement. Byers v. Byers, 222 N.C. 298, 22 S.E. 2d 902. During the past 35 years a husband and wife have been deemed to live separate and apart within the meaning of the divorce statute when: (1) they live separate and apart physically for an uninterrupted period of time at least as long as the time required by the divorce statute; and (2) their physical separation is accom *165 panied by at least an intention on the part of one of them to cease their matrimonial cohabitation. See Richardson v. Richardson, 257 N.C. 705, 127 S.E. 2d 525; Mallard v. Mallard, 234 N.C. 654, 68 S.E. 2d 247 and cases cited.

Affirmed.

Judges Campbell and Britt concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck v. Beck, 187 S.E.2d 355, 14 N.C. App. 163, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 2069 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972).

187 S.E.2d 355 (Beck v. Beck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Swygert v. Swygert
264 S.E.2d 902 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)
Earles v. Earles
224 S.E.2d 284 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1976)
Hooker v. Hooker
211 S.E.2d 34 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1975)