Beck v. Beck

6 Mont. 318
Montana Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1887·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Wade, C. J.

This is an action for divorce. There was a trial before a jury, and a general verdict in favor of plaintiff. The defendant thereupon made a motion for a judgment in his favor, notwithstanding the verdict for plaintiff, and this motion was granted. The appeal is from the judgment, and there is no evidence in the record. Divorce cases are of chancery jurisdiction (R. S. § 508), and in such cases the decree must proceed from the chancellor. Verdicts or special findings are merely advisory, and may be approved or disregarded as the conscience of the chancellor may demand.

There'was no motion for á new trial, and therefore the evidence is not before us. The judgment and decree are presumed to be supported by the evidence, until the contrary appears.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Galbraith, J., McLeary, J., and Bach, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck v. Beck, 6 Mont. 318 (Mo. 1887).

6 Mont. 318 (Beck v. Beck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davidson v. Davidson
158 P. 680 (Montana Supreme Court, 1916)
Power v. Lenoir
56 P. 106 (Montana Supreme Court, 1899)
Sanford v. Gates, Townsend & Co.
53 P. 749 (Montana Supreme Court, 1898)
Bass v. Buker
6 Mont. 442 (Montana Supreme Court, 1887)