Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Beck v. Armour Fertilizer Works

Beck v. Armour Fertilizer Works

95 S.E. 1002, 22 Ga. App. 411, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 371
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 17, 1918
Docket9402
StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.E. 1002 (Beck v. Armour Fertilizer Works) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beck v. Armour Fertilizer Works, 95 S.E. 1002, 22 Ga. App. 411, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 371 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

There is no merit in any of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial. The evidence authorized the verdict.’ Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur. (

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.E. 1002, 22 Ga. App. 411, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beck-v-armour-fertilizer-works-gactapp-1918.