Beck v. Acme Markets, Inc.

Third Circuit

Beck v. Acme Markets, Inc.

131 F.2d 51, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 2706

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedOctober 26, 1942

DocketNo. 8092

StatusPublished

This text of 131 F.2d 51 (Beck v. Acme Markets, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beck v. Acme Markets, Inc., 131 F.2d 51, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 2706 (3d Cir. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Our consideration of the testimony and the charge of the trial judge satisfies us that the questions of negligence and contributory negligence which this case raises were for the jury and that they were submitted by the trial judge in a charge which contained no prejudicial error.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court entered upon the verdict returned for the plaintiff is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Our consideration of the testimony and the charge of the trial judge satisfies us that the questions of negligence and contributory negligence which this case raises were for the jury and that they were submitted by the trial judge in a charge which contained no prejudicial error.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court entered upon the verdict returned for the plaintiff is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 F.2d 51, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 2706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beck-v-acme-markets-inc-ca3-1942.