Beck & Gregg Hardware Co. v. McKenzie
This text of 101 S.E. 806 (Beck & Gregg Hardware Co. v. McKenzie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. “As a general .rule, a court of equity will not interfere with the regular administration of an estate by the representative; and to authorize such interference, the facts must clearly show there is a good reason for so doing.” Morrison v. McFarland, 147 Ga. 465 (4), 466 (94 S. E. 569).
2. Under the pleadings and the evidence in this ease, it falls within the general rule stated in headnote 1; and consequently the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in declining to appoint a receiver, and in refusing a temporary injunction. »
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 S.E. 806, 149 Ga. 699, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beck-gregg-hardware-co-v-mckenzie-ga-1920.