Beck & Gregg Hardware Co. v. McKenzie

101 S.E. 806, 149 Ga. 699, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 375
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1920
DocketNo. 1495
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 101 S.E. 806 (Beck & Gregg Hardware Co. v. McKenzie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beck & Gregg Hardware Co. v. McKenzie, 101 S.E. 806, 149 Ga. 699, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 375 (Ga. 1920).

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. “As a general .rule, a court of equity will not interfere with the regular administration of an estate by the representative; and to authorize such interference, the facts must clearly show there is a good reason for so doing.” Morrison v. McFarland, 147 Ga. 465 (4), 466 (94 S. E. 569).

2. Under the pleadings and the evidence in this ease, it falls within the general rule stated in headnote 1; and consequently the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in declining to appoint a receiver, and in refusing a temporary injunction. »

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hamrick v. Hamrick
58 S.E.2d 145 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)
Wilcox v. Thomas
12 S.E.2d 343 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Kemp v. Trust Co.
187 S.E. 75 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Darby v. Green
162 S.E. 493 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Gaines v. Gaines
154 S.E. 883 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 S.E. 806, 149 Ga. 699, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beck-gregg-hardware-co-v-mckenzie-ga-1920.