Beck Distributing Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Beck Distributing Corp. v. United States

59 Cust. Ct. 599, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2304

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 11, 1967

DocketR.D. 11332

StatusPublished

This text of 59 Cust. Ct. 599 (Beck Distributing Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beck Distributing Corp. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 599, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2304 (cusc 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Beckworth, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the schedule of cases, attached hereto and made a part hereof, are before me on the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court:

1. That the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Scheduled of Cases, consists of bat-[600]*600teri.es, and that, at the time of exportation thereof to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or, in the absence of sales, freely offered for safe to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoice unit values, net packed, less 50%.

2. That all the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement was entered subsequent to February 27,1958.

3. That the merchandise the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule is not identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54721, effective February 27,1958.

4. That the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases may be deemed submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, is the proper basis for the determination of value of the merchandise involved herein and that said value is represented by the invoice unit values net packed, less 50 percent.

Judgement will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beckworth, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the schedule of cases, attached hereto and made a part hereof, are before me on the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court:

1. That the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Scheduled of Cases, consists of bat-[600]*600teri.es, and that, at the time of exportation thereof to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or, in the absence of sales, freely offered for safe to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoice unit values, net packed, less 50%.

2. That all the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement was entered subsequent to February 27,1958.

3. That the merchandise the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule is not identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54721, effective February 27,1958.

4. That the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases may be deemed submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, is the proper basis for the determination of value of the merchandise involved herein and that said value is represented by the invoice unit values net packed, less 50 percent.

Judgement will be entered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 Cust. Ct. 599, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beck-distributing-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1967.