Bechtold v. Watson

253 F.2d 875, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 353

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a patent case brought in the District Court under Section 145, Title 35, United' States Code.¹ It involves a plumbing fitting known as a Hi-Top Tee. The Patent Office and the District Court were of opinion that invention over the prior art was not shown. We find no reversible error.²

Affirmed.

Footnotes

1

. 66 Stat. 803 (1952).

2

. Standard Oil Development Co. v. Mar-zall, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 210, 181 F.2d 280 (D.C.Cir.1950) ; Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Sun Oil Co., 97 U.S.App.D.C. 154, 229 F.2d 37 (D.C.Cir.1956), certiorari denied, 351 U.S. 973, 76 S.Ct. 1027, 100 L.Ed. 1491 (1956).