Bechtold v. Watson
253 F.2d 875, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 353
This text of 253 F.2d 875 (Bechtold v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bechtold v. Watson, 253 F.2d 875, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 353 (D.C. Cir. 1958).
Opinion
This is a patent case brought in the District Court under Section 145, Title 35, United' States Code.1 It involves a plumbing fitting known as a Hi-Top Tee. The Patent Office and the District Court were of opinion that invention over the prior art was not shown. We find no reversible error.2
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Standard Oil Development Co. v. Marzall, Commissioner of Patents
181 F.2d 280 (D.C. Circuit, 1950)
Esso Standard Oil Company v. Sun Oil Company
229 F.2d 37 (D.C. Circuit, 1956)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
253 F.2d 875, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bechtold-v-watson-cadc-1958.