Bechtold v. Stillwagon

119 Misc. 177
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1922
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 119 Misc. 177 (Bechtold v. Stillwagon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bechtold v. Stillwagon, 119 Misc. 177 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1922).

Opinion

Cropsey, J.

Plaintiff seeks to enjoin the directors of the defendant corporation from retiring him from his position as treasurer. His contention is that he was elected treasurer by the stockholders and, therefore, cannot be removed by the directors. The by-laws provide for the election of a treasurer and other officers by the vote of the stockholders. But the statute says that the directors of a stock corporation may appoint a treasurer and other officers. Stock Corp. Law, § 30. Every corporation is given power to make by-laws, but they must be “ not inconsistent with any existing law” (Gen. Corp. Law, § 11, subd. 5); a by-law that is so incon[178]*178sistent is invalid (Matter of Keogh, Inc., 192 App. Div. 624, 630; Raub v. Gerken, 127 id. 42); as the power to elect a treasurer is by statute given to the directors, the power to remove him must likely be lodged with them. See People ex rel. Manice v. Powell, 201 N. Y. 194. The provision of the by-laws is ineffective. This action is not brought under section 172 of the General Corporation Law. Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker Memorial Baptist Church, Inc. v. Saunders
173 Misc. 455 (New York Supreme Court, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 Misc. 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bechtold-v-stillwagon-nysupct-1922.