Bechtold v. Bechtold

588 So. 2d 321, 1991 WL 225543
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 6, 1991
Docket91-0365
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 588 So. 2d 321 (Bechtold v. Bechtold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bechtold v. Bechtold, 588 So. 2d 321, 1991 WL 225543 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

588 So.2d 321 (1991)

William BECHTOLD, Appellant,
v.
Mary BECHTOLD, Appellee.

No. 91-0365.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

November 6, 1991.

William Bechtold, pro se.

No brief filed for appellee.

POLEN, Judge.

This is an appeal of a non-final order finding lack of personal jurisdiction over the appellee. The husband filed suit against the wife for dissolution of marriage and for partition; however, the husband failed to allege the basis for personal jurisdiction over the wife in his petition for dissolution of marriage. He did clearly show, in the complaint for partition, that the wife owned property in the State of Florida which constitutes a basis for long arm jurisdiction under section 48.193(1)(c), Florida Statute (1989). We therefore reverse the order of the trial court as to the partition action.

We also note that the husband may seek leave to amend his petition for dissolution of marriage to include the formality of alleging personal jurisdiction over the wife, which he did in the complaint for partition. The petition for dissolution of marriage and the complaint for partition were attached when presented to the trial court and while we can see why the court dismissed the dissolution action, e.g., Rand v. Rand, 491 So.2d 1293 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), we think that personal jurisdiction over the wife can be obtained on the basis of her ownership of property in this state.

The case is reversed and remanded with instructions to reinstate the husband's complaint for partition and, upon proper motion, *322 to allow the husband to amend his petition for dissolution if he so desires.

DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marshall v. Marshall
988 So. 2d 644 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Bechtold v. Bechtold
600 So. 2d 1289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
588 So. 2d 321, 1991 WL 225543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bechtold-v-bechtold-fladistctapp-1991.