Bechtel v. . Weaver
This text of 164 S.E. 338 (Bechtel v. . Weaver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
If it be conceded that the defendants’ plea in abatement should have been sustained (Brown v. Polk, 201 N. C., 375, 160 S. E., 357), still the correct result has been reached in another way, and the judgment will not be disturbed. Bank v. McCullers, 201 N. C., 440; Rankin v. Oates, 183 N. C., 517, 112 S. E., 32. “A new trial will not he granted when the action of the trial judge, even if erroneous, could by no possibility injure the appellant.” Butts v. Screws, 95 N. C., 215.
This disposition of the matter renders it unnecessary to consider defendants’ appeal.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
164 S.E. 338, 202 N.C. 856, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bechtel-v-weaver-nc-1932.