Bechtel v. Cutter

New York Court of Chancery

Bechtel v. Cutter

2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 72, 1843 N.Y. LEXIS 278

DecidedJanuary 23, 1843

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 72 (Bechtel v. Cutter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bechtel v. Cutter, 2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 72, 1843 N.Y. LEXIS 278 (N.Y. 1843).

Pincite

Opinion

The chancellor refused to appoint a receiver as to assigned property upon a creditor’s bill, where the defendant and the assignee swore that the whole of the assigned property was not sufficient to paythe debts for the security of which it was assigned, and that there was no intention to defraud creditors.

The application was made before- the defendants had answered.

Order appealed from affirmed, but without prejudice to right to renew application after the putting in of the answers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The chancellor refused to appoint a receiver as to assigned property upon a creditor’s bill, where the defendant and the assignee swore that the whole of the assigned property was not sufficient to paythe debts for the security of which it was assigned, and that there was no intention to defraud creditors.

The application was made before- the defendants had answered.

Order appealed from affirmed, but without prejudice to right to renew application after the putting in of the answers.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 72, 1843 N.Y. LEXIS 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bechtel-v-cutter-nychanct-1843.