Bechtel v. Central Bank & Trust Co.

164 S.E. 925, 202 N.C. 855, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 285
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 15, 1932·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As the sale which the plaintiff seeks to enjoin has already taken place, there is nothing now to restrain, and the action was properly dismissed. Rosseau v. Bullis, 201 N. C., 12, 158 S. E., 553.

It is not worth while to moot an academic question.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bechtel v. Central Bank & Trust Co., 164 S.E. 925, 202 N.C. 855, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 285 (N.C. 1932).

164 S.E. 925 (Bechtel v. Central Bank & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goad v. Chase Home Finance, LLC
704 S.E.2d 1 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)