Becerra v. Ashcroft
This text of 84 F. App'x 785 (Becerra v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Hermelindo Arriaga Becerra petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of the Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for suspension of deportation and voluntary departure. We lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary decisions to deny suspension of deportation, Kalaw v. INS, 133 F.3d 1147, 1151 (9th Cir.1997), and voluntary departure, Antonio-Cruz v. INS, 147 F.3d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1998).
Arriaga Becerra’s contention that the BIA’s streamlining procedure violates due process is foreclosed by Carriche v. Ashcroft, No. 02-71143, 2003 WL 22770121, at *3 (9th Cir. Nov.24, 2003).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 F. App'x 785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/becerra-v-ashcroft-ca9-2003.