Beazley v. State
This text of 48 So. 3d 927 (Beazley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The appellant’s motion alleges that his habitual felony offender sentence is illegal because he does not have the necessary qualifying predicate offenses. We previously reversed and remanded for the postconviction court to either attach documentation demonstrating that the appellant qualified as a habitual felony offender or to grant relief. Beazley v. State, 18 So.3d 46 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). The posteonviction court has failed to establish that the appellant qualifies for habitual felony sentencing.
Accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND for the postconviction court to grant relief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 So. 3d 927, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17927, 2010 WL 4705109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beazley-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.