Beazley Power Mower Co. v. Pearce

Seventh Circuit

Beazley Power Mower Co. v. Pearce

125 F.2d 708, 52 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 645, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4460

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedFebruary 20, 1942

DocketNo. 7790

StatusPublished

This text of 125 F.2d 708 (Beazley Power Mower Co. v. Pearce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beazley Power Mower Co. v. Pearce, 125 F.2d 708, 52 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 645, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4460 (7th Cir. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants charged appellees with infringement of Claims 2 and 4 of United States Reissue Patent to Beazley, No. 18,944. The usual defenses were interposed, and the District Court, upon its special findings and conclusions of law, adjudged the claims valid, but not infringed, and dismissed the action.

The District Court rendered a written opinion in support of its rulings. 38 Fed. Supp. 756. We approve the rulings and the reasons therein stated.

•Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants charged appellees with infringement of Claims 2 and 4 of United States Reissue Patent to Beazley, No. 18,944. The usual defenses were interposed, and the District Court, upon its special findings and conclusions of law, adjudged the claims valid, but not infringed, and dismissed the action.

The District Court rendered a written opinion in support of its rulings. 38 Fed. Supp. 756. We approve the rulings and the reasons therein stated.

•Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 F.2d 708, 52 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 645, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 4460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beazley-power-mower-co-v-pearce-ca7-1942.