Beazer v. Webster

70 A.D.3d 587, 895 N.Y.S.2d 755
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 25, 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 70 A.D.3d 587 (Beazer v. Webster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beazer v. Webster, 70 A.D.3d 587, 895 N.Y.S.2d 755 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eaul Wooten, J.), entered December 3, 2008, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants failed to meet their prima facie burden of establishing that plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury under Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Defendants’ experts did not address or attempt to distinguish the objective findings of plaintiff’s MRI, the EMG/NCV scan, and the other evidence of serious injury (see Patterson v Rivera, 49 AD3d 337 [2008]). Defendants’ failure to indicate the objective tests used to determine the range of motion in plaintiff’s cervical spine was fatal to their efforts to establish a prima facie case for summary dismissal (Offman v Singh, 27 AD3d 284 [2006]). Concur— Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Nardelli, Acosta and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fernandez v. Sukhdeep
2026 NY Slip Op 00422 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026)
Singer v. Gae Limo Corp.
91 A.D.3d 526 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Mensah v. Salah Enterprises, Inc.
90 A.D.3d 492 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 A.D.3d 587, 895 N.Y.S.2d 755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beazer-v-webster-nyappdiv-2010.