Beaver v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n

472 S.W.3d 615, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1042, 2015 WL 5933972
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 13, 2015·No. WD 78193·Published

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Appellants Jack L. Beaver and similarly situated fellow class members who obtained second mortgages on Missouri real property that were acquired and/or serviced by Respondents appeal from the rulings of the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, denying the Appellants’ motion to enforce settlement agreement and judgment relating to the defined term “Active Loan”' (which - was incorporated into the 'terms of the judgment), denying the Appellants’' alternative motion to partially vacate the underlying judgment, and denying certain unnamed plaintiffs’ motion to intervene. Because a published opinion would have no jurisprudential value, we have instead provided a memorandum of law to the parties explaining our ruling. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beaver v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n, 472 S.W.3d 615, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1042, 2015 WL 5933972 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

472 S.W.3d 615 (Beaver v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.