Beaver v. Treon

196 So. 2d 115, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3950
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 8, 1967·No. No. 35911·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 28, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition for certiorari is therefore denied.

Attorney’s fee in the amount of $250.00 is awarded to respondent’s attorney.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JT., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beaver v. Treon, 196 So. 2d 115, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3950 (Fla. 1967).

196 So. 2d 115 (Beaver v. Treon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Community Blood Bank, Inc. v. Russell
196 So. 2d 115 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1967)