Beaver v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Beaver v. State

133 S.E. 281, 35 Ga. App. 397, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 392

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 12, 1926

Docket17269

StatusPublished

This text of 133 S.E. 281 (Beaver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beaver v. State, 133 S.E. 281, 35 Ga. App. 397, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 392 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Bboxles, C. J.

The verdict was authorized by the evidence. There was an acute conflict between the evidence for the State and the evidence for the accused, but the jury, as they had a right to do, evidently believed the witnesses for the State and discredited the testimony of the witnesses for the defense. The grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial show no cause for a reversal of the judgment below overruling the motion.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bboxles, C. J.

The verdict was authorized by the evidence. There was an acute conflict between the evidence for the State and the evidence for the accused, but the jury, as they had a right to do, evidently believed the witnesses for the State and discredited the testimony of the witnesses for the defense. The grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial show no cause for a reversal of the judgment below overruling the motion.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 S.E. 281, 35 Ga. App. 397, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beaver-v-state-gactapp-1926.