Beaver v. General Accident Fire & Life Insurance

106 A.D.2d 856, 483 N.Y.S.2d 538, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21755
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 14, 1984·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously modified, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Absent proof of special circumstances, it was improper for Special Term to direct defendant to disclose its investigator’s reports on the eve of trial and 21 months after the filing of the statement of readiness (Blondell v Malone, 91 AD2d 1201). However, there is no time restraint imposed upon the right of a party to obtain a copy of his own statement (CPLR 3101, subd [e]). We find no abuse of discretion in granting the motion to disclose the names of defendant’s witnesses. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Steuben County, Purple, J. — discovery.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beaver v. General Accident Fire & Life Insurance, 106 A.D.2d 856, 483 N.Y.S.2d 538, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21755 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

106 A.D.2d 856 (Beaver v. General Accident Fire & Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buntin v. Guardian Life Insurance
134 A.D.2d 473 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)