Beaver v. Cintas Corp. No. 2

Missouri Court of Appeals

Beaver v. Cintas Corp. No. 2

347 S.W.3d 549, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 819, 2011 WL 2341148

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 14, 2011·No. ED 95464·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in plaintiffs favor in plaintiffs negligence action. The evidence in support of the jury verdict is not insufficient. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in plaintiffs favor in plaintiffs negligence action. The evidence in support of the jury verdict is not insufficient. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Beaver v. Cintas Corp. No. 2, 347 S.W.3d 549, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 819, 2011 WL 2341148 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

347 S.W.3d 549 (Beaver v. Cintas Corp. No. 2) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related