Beaver v. Carpenter

California Court of Appeal

Beaver v. Carpenter

100 Cal. App. 525

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedSeptember 7, 1929

DocketCiv. No. 6555

StatusPublished

This text of 100 Cal. App. 525 (Beaver v. Carpenter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beaver v. Carpenter, 100 Cal. App. 525 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This matter comes up on motion of respondent to dismiss an appeal taken by the defendants in the above-entitled action on the grounds:

1. That no opening brief and points and authorities have been served or filed in the above-named court within thirty [526]*526clays from the date of the filing of the transcript herein, or at all, as provided by the rules of this court.

2. That no extension of time for the filing of- the same has ever been granted, either by stipulation or affidavit, or at all.

The appellants have not even attempted to file any brief or any points or authorities, excepting only the reply affidavit of C. J. Novotny in opposition to the motion to dismiss. In said reply affidavit there is no sufficient reason given for the failure to comply with the rules of the court.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This matter comes up on motion of respondent to dismiss an appeal taken by the defendants in the above-entitled action on the grounds:

1. That no opening brief and points and authorities have been served or filed in the above-named court within thirty [526]*526clays from the date of the filing of the transcript herein, or at all, as provided by the rules of this court.

2. That no extension of time for the filing of- the same has ever been granted, either by stipulation or affidavit, or at all.

The appellants have not even attempted to file any brief or any points or authorities, excepting only the reply affidavit of C. J. Novotny in opposition to the motion to dismiss. In said reply affidavit there is no sufficient reason given for the failure to comply with the rules of the court.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 Cal. App. 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beaver-v-carpenter-calctapp-1929.