Beaver Board Companies v. Imbrie

275 F. 437, 1921 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1059
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided August 15, 1921·No. No. 297·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

This application must be denied. To grant leave to sue the defendants in a common-law action and join with them the individual defendants is contrary to the practice which ■prevails. Indeed, it might frustrate the object of this action in equity to conserve the assets of the firm of Imbrie & Co. Under the New York Partnership Eaw (Consol. Eaws, c. 39), the receivers have the right to collect from the individual members of Imbrie & Co. and such funds, when received, would constitute part of the estate of the receivers. In pursuing this effort to obtain funds from the individuals,it may be that all the personal property the individuals have (other than the copartnership property) might be required to satisfy the claims of the receivers. If a suit were permitted against individual defendants, this would be an interference with an effort of the receivers to conserve the assets of the firm and distribute them equally among the creditors. Refusing to permit Brokaw to sue now would not prevent him from later recovering against the individuals if he is entitled to. This must take place after the receivership has terminated.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beaver Board Companies v. Imbrie, 275 F. 437, 1921 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1059 (S.D.N.Y. 1921).

275 F. 437 (Beaver Board Companies v. Imbrie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harvey Brokerage Co. v. Ambassador Hotel Corp.
6 F. Supp. 345 (S.D. New York, 1934)
First National Bank & Trust Co. v. Storms
251 N.W. 576 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1933)