Beauty Service Corp. v. Davis

116 S.W.2d 463, 1938 Tex. App. LEXIS 577
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 27, 1938·No. No. 10302.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MURRAY, Justice.

Neither the appellant nor the appellee has filed briefs herein. However, appellee has filed a motion asking that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed, and that he have *464 judgment against the sureties on the super-sedeas bond.

We have examined the record and finding no fundamental error apparent of record appellee’s motion will be granted, the judgment of the trial court affirmed, and judgment here rendered for the full amount of the judgment against the sureties on the supersedeas appeal bond.

Affirmed,' with judgment against sureties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beauty Service Corp. v. Davis, 116 S.W.2d 463, 1938 Tex. App. LEXIS 577 (Tex. Ct. App. 1938).

116 S.W.2d 463 (Beauty Service Corp. v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Huntsinger v. Gates Rubber Co.
149 S.W.2d 632 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1941)