Beauty Service Corp. v. Davis

116 S.W.2d 463, 1938 Tex. App. LEXIS 577
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 27, 1938
DocketNo. 10302.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 116 S.W.2d 463 (Beauty Service Corp. v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beauty Service Corp. v. Davis, 116 S.W.2d 463, 1938 Tex. App. LEXIS 577 (Tex. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

MURRAY, Justice.

Neither the appellant nor the appellee has filed briefs herein. However, appellee has filed a motion asking that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed, and that he have *464 judgment against the sureties on the super-sedeas bond.

We have examined the record and finding no fundamental error apparent of record appellee’s motion will be granted, the judgment of the trial court affirmed, and judgment here rendered for the full amount of the judgment against the sureties on the supersedeas appeal bond.

Affirmed,' with judgment against sureties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Huntsinger v. Gates Rubber Co.
149 S.W.2d 632 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 S.W.2d 463, 1938 Tex. App. LEXIS 577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beauty-service-corp-v-davis-texapp-1938.