Beauregard v. City of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Beauregard v. City of Miami

371 So. 2d 233, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15083

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 29, 1979

DocketNo. 78-2088

StatusPublished

This text of 371 So. 2d 233 (Beauregard v. City of Miami) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Beauregard v. City of Miami, 371 So. 2d 233, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15083 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order dismissing the appellant’s complaint with prejudice is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court with directions to dismiss the said complaint with leave to amend based on the authority of Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River County, 371 So.2d 1010 (Fla.1979); Blackburn v. Dorta, 348 So.2d 287 (Fla.1977); Petterson v. Concrete Construction, Inc., 202 So.2d 191, 197-98 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.190(a). Save for the failure to allege proper notice to the appellee pursuant to Section 768.28(6), Florida Statutes (1977), which omission could be cured upon proper amendment, it is our view that the complaint herein states a proper cause of action sounding in negligence against the appellee. It was, accordingly, reversible error to dismiss the appellant’s complaint with prejudice.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order dismissing the appellant’s complaint with prejudice is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court with directions to dismiss the said complaint with leave to amend based on the authority of Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River County, 371 So.2d 1010 (Fla.1979); Blackburn v. Dorta, 348 So.2d 287 (Fla.1977); Petterson v. Concrete Construction, Inc., 202 So.2d 191, 197-98 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.190(a). Save for the failure to allege proper notice to the appellee pursuant to Section 768.28(6), Florida Statutes (1977), which omission could be cured upon proper amendment, it is our view that the complaint herein states a proper cause of action sounding in negligence against the appellee. It was, accordingly, reversible error to dismiss the appellant’s complaint with prejudice.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

371 So. 2d 233, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beauregard-v-city-of-miami-fladistctapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack