Beauregard v. City of Miami

371 So. 2d 233, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15083
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 29, 1979·No. No. 78-2088·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order dismissing the appellant’s complaint with prejudice is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court with directions to dismiss the said complaint with leave to amend based on the authority of Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River County, 371 So.2d 1010 (Fla.1979); Blackburn v. Dorta, 348 So.2d 287 (Fla.1977); Petterson v. Concrete Construction, Inc., 202 So.2d 191, 197-98 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.190(a). Save for the failure to allege proper notice to the appellee pursuant to Section 768.28(6), Florida Statutes (1977), which omission could be cured upon proper amendment, it is our view that the complaint herein states a proper cause of action sounding in negligence against the appellee. It was, accordingly, reversible error to dismiss the appellant’s complaint with prejudice.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beauregard v. City of Miami, 371 So. 2d 233, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15083 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

371 So. 2d 233 (Beauregard v. City of Miami) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Petterson v. Concrete Construction, Inc.
202 So. 2d 191 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Blackburn v. Dorta
348 So. 2d 287 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River Cty.
371 So. 2d 1010 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)